// June 29th, 2011 // No Comments » // General Information, Storm Chasing
Thought I would do a little technology summary based upon the recent release of PC Magazine’s results of their 21 city and rural area testing of mobile networks throughout the CONUS. The PC Mag test incorporated 6000 miles of driving through 21 different metro cities testing both the 3G and 4G networks of AT&T, Cricket, MetroPCS, Sprint, T-Mobile and Verizon with 16 different phones. Their results included a look at the average and maximum speeds for upload/download, the success percentage of achieving 3G speed (144Kbps) and success percentage of streaming voice/music and the all important video streaming (for chasers at least). All of these results were combined for a Mobile Speed Index (MSI) that took into account each of these factors, the Mobile Speed Index is weighted to 40% download speeds, 20% upload speeds, 20% 3G success percentage, 10% audio/video streaming (at 100Kbps & 400Kbps respectively) and 10% video streaming (at 400Kbps). In summary it was found that Verizon’s speeds blew away other competition with the metro markets, seeing as 20 of 21 of them have Verizon’s 4GLTE that doesn’t arrive as much of a surprise. But, for chasers you won’t find yourself, or hopefully not find yourself, chasing in/near a major metro area; so it is time to delve into their results of a few select metro areas in tornado alley as well as the all important rural areas over the open Plains.
The first metro stop: Kansas City, MO
Kansas City is the only metro network tested that doesn’t feature Verizon’s 4G LTE network and for that reasons ends up being the only metro area that Verizon doesn’t take home the prize in. AT&T takes home the prize with the fastest MSI score of 85, with both Sprint 4G and T-Mobile close behind; Verizon’s 3G takes 4th place overall, but a closer examination reveals a few details that chasers may want to take note of.

The success rate of a 3G speed was very good (above 85%) for all carriers except the Sprint 3G network which showed up with a dismal 37 percent! Even more interesting is comparing the further right column on the chart above, the video stream success, where the top MSI scorer AT&T was actual worst with a success rate of less than 15%. Verizon’s 3G actual led the pack with a 82% success rate with Sprint 4G just behind with a 76% success rate. Thus, despite the slower speed it would appear that the reliability of video streaming comes much better with Verizon than other networks.
Next up: Oklahoma City, OK
The proclaimed mecca of storm chasing and severe weather is just 1 of the 20 other cities that Verizon’s 4G network blew away the competition in regards of pure speed, a closer look at the details does reveal a bit of a flaw. The success rate for 3G speeds was very good for Verizon (both 3G & 4G), T-Mobile and AT&T where they all featured a 96% or better rate. Download speeds with the 4G LTE network appear just crazy at times, prompting an 8.7Mbps average an a whopping 15.68Mbps maximum; upload speeds were fast, but not as separated from the other networks.

The all important video stream success rate shows a potential flaw for the Verizon 4G network where it raked in a surprisingly low score of 82.6%, however the 3G network with Verizon carried a 96% success rate that actually led the pack. Would be interesting to find out what exactly is causing this lower success in the faster 4G network. Both AT&T and Cricket also featured good success rates while Sprint took a dive with only 61.5% success rate.
The last metro: Dallas, TX
Another metro which showed off the Verizon 4G network brought in another whopping score for the MSI and even more amazing download speeds with a 15.75Mbps average and a 37.66Mbps maximum!! Once again upload speeds were much closer for all of the networks, typically in the 1-2Mbps range. The Dallas metro is full of towers and was the fastest wireless city tested with Verizon 4G, Sprint 4G, MetroPCS and AT&T all racking up 100% success rates on achieving 3G speeds.

To the all important video streaming success rates Verizon backed up its’ speeds with a solid 93.8% and 85.7% rate for 4G and 3G respectively. The MetroPCS network actually was tops in Dallas ahead of Verizon, then AT&T and Sprint brought up the rear once again. Through the 3 metro cities it appears to be safe that Verizon took the cake with its’ speeds and the overall success rates for video streaming with an average of 88% success on both the 3G and 4G networks, MetroPCS came in at 83%, followed by AT&T, Sprint & T-Mobile all around 56-58%.
The All-Important: Rural Central
The PC Mag folks kept testing along their way between Metro cities from Chicago to St. Louis to Kansas City, passing through Wichita and Oklahoma City to Dallas and then finally west along I-20 through the rest of Texas. Obviously 4G hasn’t made it out into the country, so the 3G networks of AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile and Verizon were put to the test to see who had the better coverage, speed and streaming success. According to their MSI score it was AT&T who came out on top, followed by T-Mobile, Verizon and then Sprint bringing up the rear. This was likely due to the higher speeds for both of the AT&T and T-Mobile networks where they managed to bring in a greater than 2Mbps average download. However, when checking that 3G success rate to show how often you could lose that data signal you see that T-Mobile only managed a 36.87% rate where as AT&T and Sprint featured a near 70% rate and Verizon led the pack with a 83.83% rate. This success rate seemed to translate towards video success as well, where Verizon took first once again at just under 82%, AT&T and Sprint both had ~60% rates and T-Mobile finished with a slacking 34%.

In the end it does appear that all of the talk of Verizon and their stable network pays off with a solid connection and stable streaming capabilities throughout the Plains. While localized areas may have trouble, that will come with any network, and this latest test by PC Magazine shows just how sweet it may be as 4G continues to expand over the coming seasons. You can take a look at the entire results with more details on other metro cities and other rural areas of the west, southeast and northeast at the full article.
Let me know what you think, is Verizon truly the top dog when it comes to data reliability and streaming capability?